Search for: "Still v. Blake"
Results 1 - 20
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2008, 6:41 pm
Oregon v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:59 pm
Today marks the four-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's profoundly important constitutional ruling in Blakely v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:30 am
The players he put me with are still people I talk to every single day. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 1:43 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
This case emphasises the lesson from Amersi v Leslie [2023] EWHC 1368 (KB) that when approaching the issue of serious harm the tort rules of causation are still in play and should not be overlooked. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:37 pm
Long, long ago, when wishing still helped, and Blakely was new and full of promise (as well as threat), I picked up on the astonishing, but correct, observation by the Vera Institute in this September 2004 piece that Blakely should / could mean the end of using aggravating circumstances not specifically defined by a statute. [read post]
3 Sep 2004, 1:53 pm
P. 28(j) seeking additional review of his sentencing in light of Blakely v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:30 am
Providing a great reminder that there are still many unsettled Blakely issues, the Oregon Supreme Court today in State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:22 pm
In a court filing (Blake J Robbins v Lower Merion School District), the parents of student Blake Robbins are suing the school district for: invasion of privacy theft of personal information violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act abrogating the Computer Fraud Abuse Act abridging the Stored Communications Act running afoul of section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act and ignoring the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and… [read post]
19 Aug 2004, 3:15 pm
P. 28(j) in which he asserted that, under Blakely v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:15 am
The case of John Michael Blake and Keith Blake v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 2:24 pm
In Blakely v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:48 am
Perry v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 8:58 am
The facts in Blake v Massachusetts Mut. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:25 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, Phillips v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:18 am
"Said Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in 1992, shortly before Bill Clinton nominated her to the Supreme Court, quoted yesterday, in Aaron Blake's WaPo column, "What Ruth Bader Ginsburg really said about Roe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:47 am
It seems clear that Justice Kennedy still wants the Apprendi-Blakely rule watered down and that Justice Stevens likes the Apprendi-Blakely rule livened up. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:46 pm
The lawyers at Blake & Dorsten, P.A. have the applications prepared and ready to file for you. [read post]
