Search for: "Still v. Lance"
Results 41 - 60
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
. in Hahn v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
Wednesday in Reed Elsevier Inc. et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited Advocate General Jääskinen delivered his keenly awaited opinion. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
., v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 am
Because of the 1994 Supreme Court decision in Farmer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am
If you are so inclined, there is still plenty of time to write one. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Lance v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
Lanc. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
If they choose to withdraw their application then they will receive a US$138,000 refund (80% of the fee) [that's still a disbursement cost of US$34,500 to get this far, the same as just over 200 UK trade mark applications - Merpel]. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
The case, Lance v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Snyder v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
Lanc. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
Lanc. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:39 am
[Still trying to work out how these paragraphs relate to one another. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:14 am
Sara Parrello and Fabio AngeliniIn law, perhaps one of the most famous aphorisms is “I know it when I see it”, which Justice Potter Stewart used to describe his threshold test for obscenity (in Jacobellis v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 3:01 pm
LANCE M. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:59 pm
Dold, Timothy V. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
Burton of Hogan Lovells on the firm’s blog, Focus on Regulation Morotola v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:19 am
Konishi V. [read post]
