Search for: "Stills v. Superior Court of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 6:02 am
On July 13, 2017, in a decision with serious repercussions on the scope of PAGA discovery, the California Supreme Court overruled the Court of Appeals in Williams v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:25 am
Superior Court. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
But I didn't know that, in California, there's no statute of limitations for attempted murder either. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 6:53 am
A California Superior Court judge has invalidated state legislation that required boards of publicly held corporations headquartered in California to include a minimum number of directors from underrepresented communities. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
Superior Court remains good law. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
Superior Court remains good law. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:19 pm
At issue in Sonic-Calabasas, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:09 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court granted reivew of Brinkley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
But that didn't stop the New York courts, which (like the trial court) thought it still made sense to allow this sort of discovery, and which thus held that it was within the court's inherent power to allow it.Justice Bamattre-Manoukian says that these New York cases might be persuasive if there was nothing in California on point, but thinks there is. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 11:29 am
The California Supreme Court unanimously holds today that people found not guilty by reason of insanity have a statutory right to not testify at subsequent proceedings in which the state wants to continue their commitment to a state hospital on the grounds that the patient's continuing mental disorder represents a "substantial danger" to others. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:22 pm
Deerpoint Group, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:17 pm
Which also seems the dominant usage; 863 times in the California Supreme Court, and 6,331 times in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:42 am
So now that the writ proceedings are over, the trial can restart.Which is fine, and the California Supreme Court notes that as long as the jury is still empaneled -- which at oral argument the parties confirmed -- that same jury can get back together and resolve the matter on remand.But the opening arguments here were over two years ago. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm
Superior Court (AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.) [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 1:33 pm
Superior Court for determining whether workers in California should be classified as employees or as independent contractors. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:24 pm
The California Supreme Court is very bright. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:21 pm
The California Supreme Court today decided Barnett v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:51 pm
On June 25th, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Coito v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:58 pm
Last week, we wrote briefly about EMC v. [read post]
