Search for: "Stirling v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2015, 1:43 am by Claire Darwin, Matrix
The question for the Supreme Court in University and College Union v The University of Stirling was whether a dismissal because a limited term contract had expired and had not been renewed was a dismissal ‘for a reason not related to the individual concerned. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:39 pm
It was enacted in 1985 by the California State Legislature and has been amended over 45 times. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
It stated that the fact that the employee had entered into a Limited Term Contract could not mean that the dismissal was for a reason related to the individual. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
Gathii, Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited, and Stirling Capital Limited v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:15 am by admin
In light of last year’s decision in Worldmark v. [read post]
24 Dec 2000, 2:00 am
  This change reinforces the concept  recognized by the California Court of appeals in Beehan v Lido Isle Community Association that not all association disputes have to be enforced or resolved by the association. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:38 am by Rachel Howie
[1] Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (PTY) Limited, and Stirling Capital Limited v Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
University and College Union v The University of Stirling, heard 21 January 2015. [read post]