Search for: "Stocking v. Marsh" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 8:31 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  A company’s provision of stock options to employees was deemed satisfactory consideration for a non-compete agreement in Marsh USA Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm by Russell Cawyer
Last summer, I detailed the Dallas Court of Appeals' decision in Marsh USA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:26 am by Russell Cawyer
More from BusinessInsurance.com  Stock Options Offer Valid in Marsh Noncompete Dispute: Texas High Court. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:33 am
My good friend Mike Maslanka has an excellent post up on his Work Matters Blog this week discussing the Texas Supreme Court's granting review of  Marsh USA Inc, et al. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
In Illinois, the Supreme Court acts like this area of law doesn't exist.I will continue to follow the Marsh case and opine on what I'm sure will be a reversal. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:28 am by Colleen McGushin
On April 9, the Texas Supreme Court granted review in Marsh USA Inc, et al. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 10:23 am by Megan B. Center
A recent decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Court) in Marsh v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
The employees were eligible for valuable employment benefits through Marsh, including stock options and stock units, some of which they could have been entitled to upon termination if (for example) they retired or were fired without cause. [read post]