Search for: "Stockton Citizens v. City of Stockton"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
The ruling makes Stockton the largest U.S. city to seek bankruptcy protection. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:30 am
Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:57 am
However, it confirms the principle set forth in the recent California Supreme Court’s Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
The Court harmonized its holding with the language of the Supreme Court in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
In a lengthy opinion for Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 10:05 pm
Relying upon Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
” The Court harmonized its holding with the language of the Supreme Court in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 43 [NODs]; Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:31 am
In Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:20 am
” (Quoting Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 2:28 pm
City of Stockton, 2007 Cal. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
Meyers Nave attorneys Jayne Williams and Joe Quinn are counsel of record for the City of Stockton in O'Connell. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 5:56 am
Lyda v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:25 pm
We review the constitutionality of a statute de novo, see Stockton v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:47 pm
The municipal bankruptcies in two California cities — Stockton and San Bernardino — also support the court’s observation that unsustainable collective-bargaining agreements have contributed to other municipal bankruptcies. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
The court's full opinion addressing the applicability of section 21167(e) is not expected until sometime in April when the court issues its opinion in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm
Food for Thought As many of you die-hard CEQA lovers know, the Supreme Court is expected to hear oral argument in the Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
(E.g., Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:57 am
In Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
