Search for: "Stokes v. General Services Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Texas) and Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
This week the Trump Administration also stoked controversy by suggesting it may restrict the legal definition of sex to a person’s biological sex at birth. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:31 am
I wanted to show where these views came from and how they evolved through each man’s public service. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am
-supported coalition government in Tripoli, General Khalifa Haftar. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
The decision of the Administrative Court is uncontroversial but it does raise some interesting points about the jurisdiction of SIAC, a creature of statute created as a response to a 1996 decision of the European Court of Human Rights (Cahal v UK). [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Three generations of imbeciles are enough. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm
Luckily, the public service community has been thinking about this generational shift for decades and has the research and expertise to help [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am
Van Barr, Sunny Handa ; general editor, Sunny Handa. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:49 am
In Tomkins v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
In the case of Stokes v Ragless [2017] SASC 159 Bampton J awarded general and aggravated damages of Aus$90.000 in respect of website, email and Facebook publications. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Or so say, anyway, a series of judicial rulings and administrative findings. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am
As the general counsel for the Immigration and Naturalization Service during the Clinton administration correctly noted back in July 2000, “The doctrine of prosecutorial discretion applies to enforcement decisions, not benefit decisions. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
This effectively opened the door for patients to readily participate in genetic testing without the fear of losing their insurance due to the presence of a preexisting illness or disease.[5] V. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
The Attorney General has issued a contempt of court warning about publishing anything that could prejudice any future criminal investigation into Russell Brand. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On the same day there was a hearing in Thurrock Council v Stokes and others before Nicklin J. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
The BBC Director General also made a public statement of apology. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:07 am
For all the political tumult demanding – and exhausting – the attention of Americans – the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
