Search for: "Stokes v. General Services Administration"
Results 21 - 40
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
As a general matter, it’s hard to see how driving an interagency process to develop a strategy for a key presidential initiative—which usually means, t [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
This effectively opened the door for patients to readily participate in genetic testing without the fear of losing their insurance due to the presence of a preexisting illness or disease.[5] V. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
Levi Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:49 am
In Tomkins v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
This week the Trump Administration also stoked controversy by suggesting it may restrict the legal definition of sex to a person’s biological sex at birth. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
In the case of Stokes v Ragless [2017] SASC 159 Bampton J awarded general and aggravated damages of Aus$90.000 in respect of website, email and Facebook publications. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am
-supported coalition government in Tripoli, General Khalifa Haftar. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am
As the general counsel for the Immigration and Naturalization Service during the Clinton administration correctly noted back in July 2000, “The doctrine of prosecutorial discretion applies to enforcement decisions, not benefit decisions. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm
” The Washington Post shares insights from an unnamed senior administration official, who said, “part of the dynamic we want to show is that these guys aren’t ten feet tall . . . [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:31 am
I wanted to show where these views came from and how they evolved through each man’s public service. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
The decision of the Administrative Court is uncontroversial but it does raise some interesting points about the jurisdiction of SIAC, a creature of statute created as a response to a 1996 decision of the European Court of Human Rights (Cahal v UK). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am
Van Barr, Sunny Handa ; general editor, Sunny Handa. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Still, I thought it best to include them for general reference purposes. *** As one might expect, not all of the Chief Justices or Justices of the Court wrote books. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
” (U.S. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Texas) and Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
Such points include the acts of torture and abuse which constitute war crimes, the high level individuals of the American Government who ordered, authorized, or approved these acts plus some of the lower level officials who committed them, and the warnings of illegality and immorality given to the culpable American officials -- as news of their secret actions slowly began to percolate within the Executive branch -- by persons ranging from FBI officials on the ground, to other executive investigative… [read post]
