Search for: "Stokes v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2015, 2:39 am by Darius Whelan
  Some extra points:The Supreme Court case is Stokes v Christian Brothers High School [2015] IESC 13.My article only discusses the main judgment in the case, agreed by three judges. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:39 am by Darius Whelan
  Some extra points:The Supreme Court case is Stokes v Christian Brothers High School [2015] IESC 13. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:42 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Smith, and Michael Stokes Paulsen have all argued that the law’s special treatment of religion, notably the ministerial exception upheld in Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Smith, Third Circuit: As part of Appellant Smith's sentence for bank fraud and aggravated identity theft, he was ordered to pay restitution of $68,452. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:30 am by Howard Ullman
Stokes & Smith Co., 329 U.S. 637 (1947), the Supreme Court applied a rule of reason analysis to a grantback provision in an exclusive license agreement. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:42 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Miami attorney Juan Antunez of Stokes McMillan Maracini & Antunez in his Florida Probate & Trust Litigation Blog Michigan Film Office Approves First Video Game Project for Tax Incentives - Washington DC lawyer Drew Boortz of Reed Smith on the firm's blog, Developing Concerns Doctor, Doctor, (Don't) Give Me the News: Appeals Court Diagnoses "Infectious Invalidity" - Boston attorney Robert Foster of Rackemann Sawyer & Brewster on the… [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
The defendant in capital case Stokes v. [read post]