Search for: "Stokes v. Williams" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2016, 7:04 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence  — Armed robbery and conspiracy A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted appellant William Stokes of attempted second degree murder, first degree assault, robbery with a deadly weapon, and conspiracy to commit robbery. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Konar-Steenberg (William Mitchell)Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky (Florida)Kevin Francis O'Neil (Cleveland State)Michael Stokes Paulsen (St. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Konar-Steenberg (William Mitchell)Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky (Florida)Kevin Francis O'Neil (Cleveland State)Michael Stokes Paulsen (St. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:28 am by INFORRM
     Jeremy Clarke-Williams, partner, and Nilly Tabatabai, trainee solicitor, Penningtons Manches Cooper   This article was first published in New Law Journal on 6/12/19 and is reproduced with kind permission [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
That SSRN/Penn Law Review article by William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen on DJT's disqualification under the 14th Amendment is getting some traction in the popular media (Time, NYT, The Conversation). [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:38 pm
Here's a link to a more detailed summary.Forrest Lee Stokes v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am by Carolina Attorneys
Stokes, 274 N.C. 409, 412, 163 S.E.2d 770, 772 (1968), and our Court has long recognized that subject matter jurisdiction can be raised for the first time on appeal, see State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:19 pm
., as the Court was about to wind up its hearing on Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm by Susan Brenner
Williams, 284 N.C. 67, 199 S.E.2d 409 (North Carolina Supreme Court 1973)). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
In a new article, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen argue that the answer is yes because “essentially all the evidence concerning the original textual meaning of Section Three . . . points in the same direction . . . . [read post]