Search for: "Stone v. District of Columbia" Results 81 - 100 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Preemption, of course, would be The Beatles, and Daubert/Frye the Rolling Stones. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Ken White
Schmalfeldt also reported Stranahan to the Dallas Police, the FBI, the District Attorney, the Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and Texas Family Protective Services, apparently on the theory that Stranahan had once taken erotic potographs and (1) Stranahan wouldn't provide Schmalfeldt with releases and therefore must have taken pictures of underaged girls, and (2) Stranahan must be providing an unfit home for his family. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:38 pm by Jason Mazzone
They invalidated gun laws that, as measured by the rest of the nation, were extreme outliers: a total ban in the District of Columbia and Chicago respectively. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:25 pm by Ben Vernia
District of Columbia, that the Supreme Court had undercut the premise of its interpretation in its decision in Rockwell Int’l v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the case of Ali Hamza Suliman Ahmad Al Bahlul v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here is the entirety of its Second Amendment analysis:Appellee [i.e., Stone] also urges this court to affirm the trial court’s dismissal based upon the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which, pursuant to District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 2:42 pm
Rarely does the IPKat find a single illustration that so aptly combines two unrelated news items as on this occasion The United States has a unitary patent system that appears to cover all 50 States, together with the District of Columbia and a handful of other offshore locations. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Alpharma USPD, 887 So.2d 881, 883 (Ala. 2004) (applied to pharmacists); Morguson v. 3M Corp., 857 So.2d 796. 801-02 (Ala. 2003) (applied to medical devices); Stone v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:54 pm by Eric
The guidelines are very similar to Colorado's Tattered Cover balancing test (Tattered Cover v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm by admin
Recent case developments under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Stone v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This resonates with Durkheim’s idea of the sacred, just as a totemic mark distinguishes ordinary pieces of wood and stone from the totem. [read post]