Search for: "Stone v. District of Columbia" Results 101 - 120 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
  At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh looks back at a footnote in the Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Under the settlement filed in federal court in Columbia, S.C., Norfolk Southern will be required to pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, to be deposited in the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm by Carter Ruml
  He started as a claims manager in 1927, and his career grew along with the Company, as it expanded to be a multi-line insurer writing policies in 11 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(The IP Factor) ‘Laboratoire Remede’ and ‘Remede Spa’ considered generic (The IP Factor) Supreme Court rules that usage of ‘Shemesh’ (Sun) by competing restaurant is kosher (The IP Factor) Israel patent office publishes decision on design for kerb-stone (IP Factor)   Italy Italy scores three more PDOs - Marrone di Caprese Michelangelo, Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio, Crudo di Cuneo (Class 46) Lavazza to Nespresso – we were in Heaven first… [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Wiesmueller v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
By Ethan Ackerman On Dec. 23, 2008, federal District Judge Maxine Chesney issued what the defense attorneys in Hoang v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 836-37 (Conn. 2001).District of Columbia: Dyson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:46 am
" 'When you got nothing, you got nothing to lose.' Bob Dylan, Like a Rolling Stone, on Highway 61 Revisited (Columbia Records 1965). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:45 am
As the District Court for the District of Columbia put it while granting summary judgment to the government in American Forest Research Council v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:06 pm
The Constitution leaves the District of Columbia a variety of tools for combating that problem, including some measures regulating handguns, see supra, at 54-55, and n. 26. [read post]
15 May 2008, 7:00 am
District Court for the Central District of California held in Columbia Pictures v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 7:01 am
Heath Department of Anesthesiology Columbia University 630 West 168th St. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 357920 Seattle, WA 98195-7920 Phone: (206) 685-4181; (800) 214-8731 (I&R/Toll Free) TTY: (206) 616-1396 E-mail: uwat@u.washington.edu Web: http://wata.org Washington Loan Program Washington Assistive Technology Foundation 3670 Stone Way North Seattle, WA 89103 Phone: (206) 826-1038 TTY: (800) 214-8731 (Toll Free) Fax: (206) 826-1138 E-mail: fpennell@watf.org Telecommunications Access Service P.O. [read post]