Search for: "Stone v. Public Utility Hearing Board"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
What is the utility and importance of the public interest litigation? [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
Blue Stone Constr., Inc., 48 So. 3d 941, 942 (Fla. 1st Dist. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:00 pm
Falls Road Community Ass’n, Inc., v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
It that respect it represents a middle ground from which one might better consider changes to the way that lawyer regulatory bodies are approaching the quite crucial question of lawyer engagement with core principles of human rights in a UNGP context.It is with this in mind that it is possible to more clearly and dispassionately consider the "interesting spat" that recently emerged into public view, precipitated by efforts of the Norwegian Bar to draft mandatory provisions… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
There was also a hearing in the case of LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in… [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Matt Gaetz predicted Stone would be found guilty at his trial but would not “do a day” in prison. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Francis Xavier v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
Leisner, a Senior Member in the Trenam law firm in Tampa, found that increasingly he has been called upon to be a sounding board and resource on proposed corporate transactions. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Such a determination “would require a full evidentiary hearing” – although by a court or a jury the court did not decide. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
The third ordinance (No. 5172, the “Sign Ordinance”), also adopted in 2014 (pursuant to several categorical exemptions from CEQA), allowed administrative approval of certain sign exceptions with a public notice, while providing for a public hearing before the zoning administrator for exceptions exceeding certain limits; previously, any application for signs exceeding County’s regulations required a variance and public hearing. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
During the five weeks Occupy SLC members were protesting in Pioneer Park, its encampment utilized only the southwest corner of the park, never monopolizing the public space to the extent others were kept from its use or enjoyment. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Navistar had said it withdrew that legal action once EPA had “promised to hold a public workshop or hearing to address issues Navistar raised in its federal court appeal of EPA’s certification policies for SCR-equipped diesel powered trucks. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Click Here Anchorage Waste Water Utility and Contractor Pay $9850 EPA Storm Water Penalty. [read post]
