Search for: "Stone v. Stephens" Results 1 - 20 of 207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2009, 1:56 am
Stone and Rolls (in Liquidation) v Moore Stephens (a Firm) House of Lords “A company, exclusively controlled by a single director so as to be primarily liable for frauds committed against third parties, could not bring a claim for damages against its auditors on the basis that they had failed to detect the fraudulent activities, that they [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:55 am
Stone & Rolls Ltd (in liquidation) v Moore Stephens (a firm) [2009] UKHL 39; [2009] WLR (D) 277 “A company, which was in the exclusive control of its sole director and shareholder so as to be primarily liable for frauds committed against third parties, could not bring an action for damages against its auditors on the [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:59 am
Moore Stephens (a firm) (Respondents) v Stone Rolls Limited (in liquidation (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 39 (30 July 2009) Lexington Insurance Company (Respondents) v AGF Insurance Limited (Appellants) and one other action Lexington Insurance Company (Respondent) v Wasa International Insurance Company Limited (Appellants) and one other action [2009] UKHL 40 (30 July 2009) Fisher (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v [...] [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am by Sarah Grant
One preliminary injunction does remain in place in Stone v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:11 pm by David Lat
Here’s what one of Stephen McDaniel’s college professors, Eric O’Dell, said about him:[I]t’s fair to say that Stephen was kind of quirky. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
The 'intelligence of a future day': the vindication of Justice Stephen's dissent in Henry v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 4:57 am
  Anyway, now the justices are contemplating a motion for reconsideration in their Kennedy v. [read post]