Search for: "Stone v. Taylor" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:53 am
As reported previously on this weblog, in 2012 the World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body decided in favour of Mexico in the long-standing Mexico v USA dolphin-safe labelling dispute. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:02 pm
Taylor, 2008 BCSC 1498 (5 days);Stone v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:49 pm by Ken Lammers
Be advised, trial judges, that anything outside of that is not allowed per Taylor v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
McCaffrey and Birney allege covert surveillance was used against them in an attempt to reveal their source for an allegedly leaked document from the Police Ombudsman’s office, which appeared in their documentary No Stone Unturned on the 1994 UVF massacre in Loughinisland, Co Down. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Stone (Univ. of Chicago Law School) Rebecca Tushnet (Georgetown Univ. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:33 pm by Darrin Mish
Campbell, who testified at the Hague in Liberian warlord Charles Taylor’s trial that she received some ‘dirty looking stones’ from him in 1997 must now wish had she kept some of those blood diamonds to pay her tax debts. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
With respect to the arbitrary and unrealistic time deadlines, the authors look for support in DeLaune v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]