Search for: "Stone v. Wisconsin"
Results 121 - 130
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Shoemaker, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Sanctuary Law and a Strong Anglo-Saxon State? [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:36 pm
., v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Wiesmueller v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:33 am
The case is Wiesmueller v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm
Small cottage, big stone temple: both very traditional.]Jonathan Zittrain, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School Was at 1999 ARL and OCLC joint meeting in Colorado – sensed fearLibrary definitions, noun - pooling arrangement to deal with scarcity, first sale doctrine, organized piracy Notes JP’s use of lib as verb [my notes unclear here]Talks abt “consumption of knowledge. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 2:08 pm
" It should be at the heart of contemporary public discussion.Larry Marx, the executive director of the Donor Collaborative of Wisconsin, has a three page article calling for "a broader definintion of democracy," with the subhead "Small reforms won't bring the system-wide change we need. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
Ritchie v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Alpharma USPD, 887 So.2d 881, 883 (Ala. 2004); Morguson v. 3M Corp., 857 So.2d 796. 801-02 (Ala. 2003); Stone v. [read post]
