Search for: "Straight v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 3,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  [Note:  I guess I can see why he thought those cases were good ones to cite given the particular facts of his case, but this leads straight into the Benson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
This was a wage and hour case, in which Cal Supremes held that an arbitration agreement did not bar an employee from using a statutory, pro-employee administrative procedure before the State Labor Commissioner to try to get a favorable ruling instead of going straight to contractual arbitration. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:39 pm by Ilya Somin
Evans in 1996– which struck down a Colorado voter initiative that abolished antidiscrimination protections based on sexual orientation –to U.S. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:14 pm by Randy Barnett
Earlier this morning, the state Attorneys General filed their cert petition with some very interesting claims, including a request that the Court reconsider its 1985 decision in Garcia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 5:46 pm by Matt Monahan
Brown went back to prison to finish the 15 years.This week, in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 7:55 am
"); McKithen VII, 481 F.3d at 91-92 ("‘[O]ur procedure has been always haunted by the ghost of the innocent man convicted . . . .'" (quoting United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Cranston J referred to the privacy rights of the children but stated that the Article 8 rights of the children cannot operate as a trump card. [read post]