Search for: "Straight v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2023, 7:53 am
” R v Papalia stated that causing bodily harm to the victim is not an essential element of the offence of sexual assault with a weapon. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:35 pm
See Kettenring v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:41 am
Additionally, as indicated in R. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:18 am
Ecolab relied on federal regulation CFR 778.210, which states that a percentage bonus based on straight time and overtime earnings satisfies federal overtime requirements. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:18 am
At the 2021 Supreme Court hearing in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:58 pm
If you need to know what the relevant arguments are from each side in Smith v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
As the Supreme Court has stated, “the circumstances in which a question of law can be extricated from the interpretation process will be rare”: Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:23 am
What about state law? [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:28 am
So, let’s set the record straight: privacy and data protection are not the same thing. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:37 pm
The case also (3) raises a straight-up due process challenge to the IPR system. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:24 am
Astley v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:15 am
A tow truck collided with a Honda CR-V. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:52 am
Amazon, Joseph v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Consider the reforms of Solon and then of Cleisthenes in Athens, the outcome of the Social War in Rome, and of course the Reconstruction Amendments, the expansion of the franchise to women, and similar moments in the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:03 am
This court cut through that and got straight to the point. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
The history of price regulation was noted briefly by the Supreme Court in Munn v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 1:38 am
In this case--as I brought up at a recent Madrid conference I attended via Teams--the AG opinion is not just one key player's views: more than 20 EU and European Economic Area Member States, the EU Council (where the governments of the EU Member States cast their votes), the European Parliament, and the European Commission took such positions as well. [read post]
