Search for: "Strange v. Strange" Results 81 - 100 of 3,713
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Richard Re
One of the most salient indictments of 303 Creative v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 4:45 am by jonathanturley
Hunter, however, may now find himself in strange company in seeking to avoid any federal charge. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Patryk I. Labuda
Last month, the International Center for the Prosecution of the Crime of Aggression (ICPA) against Ukraine opened its doors in The Hague. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm by Chris Castle
Recall that one of the AI first class actions was brought by graphic artists against–wait for it–Stable Diffusion and Midjourney (Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz Music v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The sale of offices-as-property may seem strange and even corrupt to modern readers, but it was a long-lasting and practical foundation for the nation-state, modern administration, and colonial expansion.Whereas vénalité had grown out of control in revolutionary-era France, the English had a more stable system of freehold property rights, a distinctive English protection of the officeholders’ investment against “despotic” displacement. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Scott Burris
This sense of gun policy as constitutionally fixed creates a strange and jarring contrast between Bruen and Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]