Search for: "Straub v. Straub"
Results 21 - 40
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2016, 7:44 am
In the end, the Second Circuit (Kearse and Straub with Wesley in dissent) says, the State Court of Appeals did not reasonably apply settled constitutional law in upholding the conviction. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:49 am
In McCarty v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:49 am
In McCarty v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 7:10 am
UL LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 7:10 am
UL LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:17 am
In this case, he puts his theoretical background to work in providing a tutorial on some basis torts concepts arising from a skiing accident that left a man badly injured in Vermont.The case is Gemmink v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
Stanley v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:49 am
The case is Davis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:35 am
The case is Gortat v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:15 am
” Huth v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:50 am
The Court of Appeals (Kearse, Straub and Wesley) says plaintiff's first argument (that the district court gave no consideration to his interests in ruling on consolidation) is frivolous. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
" This case tells us how it shakes out.The case is Chung v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
In two prior cases, Illinois v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 12:32 pm
The case is Pincus v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
This plaintiff wins.The case is Golodner v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
In that case, Piesco v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:18 am
" While this ruling is meant for district judges, if you handle cases in federal court and summary judgment motions are a part of your life, you should also read it.The case is Jackson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:53 am
What makes it interesting to you is that the Second Circuit uses the case to shed light on what makes a constitutional Takings case ripe for judicial review.The case is Sherman v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:14 am
But according to the Court (Straub, Sack and Lohier), counsel "declined to pursue the alibi because the evidence did not conclusively establish Matthews' innocence and because it could supply a possible motive for the burglary. [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:32 am
Some district courts applied a different definition for the Titles, but the Court of Appeals (Lohier, Sack and Straub) puts its foot down. [read post]
