Search for: "Strauss v. Industrial Commission" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2007, 4:24 am
McBride and Larson each paid $750,000 and were barred from the industry. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
READ 462- 476·      Peter Strauss, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch, 84 Colum.L.Rev. 573 (1984)  READ INTRO and PART I__________Mistretta v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[i] “Big Law” is the term used in the legal industry to describe the biggest and most prestigious firms in the US; in this case firms that were cited in media sources included Ropes & Gray, Schulte Roth + Zable, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Simpson Thatcher & Bartlet. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
She filed a civil lawsuit against him in August, before criminal charges against Strauss-Kahn were dismissed. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard:  Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Spicy IP) PanIIT Alumni India leads the way in incubating ideas (Spicy IP) Rigging data: IPRs and the impact of counterfeits (Spicy IP) The Competition Commission: separation of power troubles again? [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Chairman Schapiro has also initiated efforts to bring greater industry expertise to the staff. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]