Search for: "Strickland v. Jackson"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
Jackson, COA22-280, ___ N.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Jackson Nat’l Life Ins. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:34 am
Jackson PDF Professor StricklandJoseph Harroz, Jr. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
See NLRB v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization (rescheduled nine times, then relisted 12 times), and Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:07 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Shadra Strickland. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 14-997, involving a similar Mississippi law, has been sent back to the waiting room. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 14-997, which when we last saw it had been relisted six times. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
Kulbicki 14-848Issue: Whether an appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
It asks whether an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Kobach v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The petition asks if an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
