Search for: "Strickland v. Lee*"
Results 21 - 40
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2017, 12:35 pm
’” People v Gioglio, 296 Mich App 12 (2012), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 688, 694; 104 St Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 2:23 pm
Thus, Lee satisfied the first prong of the ineffective assistance test of Strickland v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:51 am
Padilla v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:21 am
But Lee’s conviction should still stand, the government argued, because the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 10:07 am
Under the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Jennings v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
The caption V.L. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Wearry v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Ash v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 7:10 am
To discuss the case, we have Jack Park, who is Of Counsel with Strickland Brockington Lewis LLP. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Caret v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Chatman, 13-8725, which asked whether Georgia’s Supreme Court improperly revisited the performance prong of Strickland v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
In 2010 the Court issued a per curiam opinion (after calling for the record and nine relists) summarily vacating a Georgia Superior Court decision for misapplying the second (prejudice) prong of Strickland v. [read post]
