Search for: "Strickland v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
That the plaintiff, by reason of age, infirmity, or otherwise, is now or may be entitled in the future to receive any compensation or benefits by reason of the Social Security Law of the United States or from any governmental agency such as the veterans' Administration, Medicare, or sources of this nature.5. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Commissioner of Social Security    Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City 08a0312p.06 2008/08/22 Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Mueller 15-574Issue: Whether the Social Security Act’s anti-assignment provision bars a state court from considering in any manner future Social Security payments in dividing marital property upon divorce. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm by Mark Zamora
That the plaintiff, by reason of age, infirmity, or otherwise, is now or may be entitled in the future to receive any compensation or benefits by reason of the Social Security Law of the United States or from any governmental agency such as the veterans' Administration, Medicare, or sources of this nature.5. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  New York’s Board of Education has got to be hoping the Court doesn’t do social promotion, because four repeats is usually enough for most people just to give in. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Correll Issue: Whether the court of appeals properly applied the prejudice standard set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm by Ben Cheng
TexasIssue: (1) Whether a state habeas petitioner who raises a freestanding actual-innocence claim under the Due Process Clause, and who demonstrates actual innocence by at least a preponderance of the evidence, must instead make that showing by clear and convincing evidence to warrant a new trial; and (2) whether, in light of trial counsel’s errors, petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of Strickland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
As a consequence, the appointment of Stevens’ successor by a Democratic President with a Democratic Senate is unlikely to shift the Court’s rulings on most important social issues, such as abortion, affirmative action, religion, and gay rights. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
Related Posts Drawing That Explains Social Networking How to visualize social networking. [read post]