Search for: "Strickland v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
United States: Donnell argues that his claim of ineffective assistance is stronger because his appellate counsel had the benefit of the King decision two weeks before the direct appeal was decided. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am by Albert Wan
One year later, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Since counsel framed the claim exclusively in therms of the United States Constitution that Copurt applied the federal test for IAC set forth in Strickland v Washington (466 US 668); see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114-115).On appeal Ms. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm by Matthew B. Kaplan
Strickland Waterproofing Company, Incorporated, no. 3:20-cv-00076, was before the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. [read post]