Search for: "Strickland v. Washington" Results 1 - 20 of 550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 6:27 am by Alex Phipps
The Court then turned to the applicable review in the current case, explaining that under Strickland v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am by Amy Howe
It argued that the lower court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals took up defendant’s current appeal and applied the two-prong analysis from Strickland v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 8:51 pm by Jon Katz
Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 (1979)); requiring that counsel be effective (Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:43 pm by Frank Heft
In its analysis of the deficiency prong of the test in Strickland v. [read post]