Search for: "Strickland v. Washington"
Results 201 - 220
of 550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2007, 4:56 am
The panel concluded that the Supreme Court of South Carolina did not unreasonably apply Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:04 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
SEE STRICKLAND v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
Etherton 15-723Issue: Whether the Court of Appeals failed to apply either layer of the double deference due on federal habeas review when a state court’s Strickland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:35 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:16 am
With regard to the ineffective assistance of counsel argument, the court noted that, in criminal proceedings, such claims are evaluated under the two-step analysis of Strickland v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:54 pm
The petition of the day is: Howes v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:53 am
The standard for the 3.850 claim is set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:13 am
The 1984 case, Strickland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
Strickland v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:47 pm
SEE STRICKLAND v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:13 am
We conclude that the Court of Appeals of Indiana unreasonably applied Strickland v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
Washington, 466 U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
In evaluating counsel’s performance under the first Strickland v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
Washington and therefore applies retroactively. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
That remarkable behavior is constitutional pursuant to the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
