Search for: "Strickland v. Washington"
Results 21 - 40
of 550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2023, 7:59 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
John v. [read post]
Can fishermen be required to pay for federal monitors? And by the way – should Chevron be overruled?
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
New Relists Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
First, Carnahan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:56 am
The standard for evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in a court-martial is the two-part test established in Strickland v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:49 am
Washington) [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
Whether you’re good with lack of preservation arguments, or the exceptionally low bar of Strickland v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 3:00 pm
Supreme Court precedent in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
See NLRB v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:15 am
Washington. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm
Next up is Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
