Search for: "Strickland v. Washington" Results 41 - 60 of 550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am by John Elwood
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am by John Elwood
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
., Learning, Memory & Cognition, 378 (2011). [4] Strickland v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit violated basic principles of Strickland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Cronic — in which the Supreme Court suggested that, though Strickland v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:59 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit’s decision — invalidating Anthony Hines’ decades-old murder conviction and death sentence on the ground that a state court unreasonably applied Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 8:09 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Herring did not meet the test for ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]