Search for: "Strickland v. Washington" Results 81 - 100 of 550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2016, 8:01 pm by Kate Howard
Washington; (3) whether the Eleventh Circuit may grant habeas relief under Strickland not withstanding that (a) the defendant waived presentation of mitigation and impeded counsel’s attempts to do so, or (b) the evidence the defendant claims should have been presented was either not available, not credible, or not mitigating; and (4) whether Schriro v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am by stu@crimapp.com
Since the Court’s 1984 ruling in Strickland v Washington, the United States Supreme Court has applied a two part test for determining whether counsel was ineffective: (a) whether there was a breach of counsel’s duty to the defendant; and, (b) “but for” that error, the defendant stood a reasonable chance for acquittal. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 10:20 am by Doug B.
Washington regarding the impact of relevant conduct on his potential sentence prior to meeting with the probation officer, amounted to constitutionally deficient performance under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:43 pm by Frank Heft
In its analysis of the deficiency prong of the test in Strickland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In last week’s post,  we explored how the case of Adnan Syed serves as a powerful vehicle to teach Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by Jon Sands
Also, the panel questioned prior circuit precedent holding that Strickland v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 7:17 pm by Maureen Johnston
Washington and subsequent decisions of this Court applying Strickland's prejudice standard. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Lee, 52 M.J. 51, 53 (C.A.A.F. 1999), in light of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm by Joshua Matz
CobbDocket: 11-294Issue(s): (1) Whether, under Strickland v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:27 am
Wood challenged his sentence in state post-conviction proceedings on the ground that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]