Search for: "Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe" Results 101 - 120 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
In response to an order issued by the California Supreme Court, we consider whether, in light of the holding in People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:39 am by Kirk Jenkins
Four years later, the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  It’s striking that ATTM asks the Court to begin with this assumption as though it were an uncontroversial and obvious abstract legal principle instead of a factual issue to be resolved on a case-by-case basis in light of actual admissible.2   In any event, if the Court limits its holding in Concepcion to the question presented, then whatever that holding is, it should not apply whenever class actions are necessary for the effective vindication of… [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am by MOTP
(holding Rule 11 agreement enforced by breach-of contract claim); see also Padilla v. [read post]