Search for: "Strong v. Clark"
Results 21 - 40
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
A “Strong Likelihood” of Change: Sixth Circuit Joins the Fifth in Raising the FLSA Certification Bar
22 May 2023, 9:53 am
But the tides are changing, as evidenced most recently by the Sixth Circuit’s May 19, 2023 decision in Clark v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:23 am
V. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Earlier this year, in Clark v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
In the case of Clark v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:36 pm
Concepcion and DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:50 pm
LexBlog Network bloggers are still going strong in commenting about the Halbig v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 10:27 am
Thompson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court decided Ohio v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Earlier this year, in Clark v. [read post]
Centaurs, Jean Valjean, and a proposed three-sentence ruling on the meaning of favorable termination
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm
The rule, he said, has strong support in common law and exists for good reason. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
’State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 4:01 pm
Or will it be the Florida Kleiman v Wright lawsuit? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
Moyer is guilty of bribery, and Justice Bromberg's opinion in a couple of places similarly mentions that the evidence against him might not be especially strong (albeit sufficient for an indictment). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:46 am
adredir=1 The Bar Council took an equally strong stance. [read post]
