Search for: "Strong v. Cox"
Results 61 - 80
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
The claim says Cox failed to disconnect 200,000 repeat copyright infringers. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Aug. 4, 2020): Not a really significant case, but I like it because it involves a strong illustration of the concept of relativity of title—the owner of these works is not Disney, and successfully registered the copyright thereto and asserted an infringement claim against a person who copied these works on Etsy. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:31 am
., claimed that human resources manager Leonard Cavaluzzi regularly made both inappropriate remarks and gestures of a strong sexual nature on numerous occasions. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am
” Additional commentary on the guidelines comes from Adam Cox and Ryan Goodman at Just Security, Leah Litman at Take Care, and Marty Lederman at Just Security here and here. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm
Jane wrote an amicus brief in IMS v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Maybe we have strong intuitions about preferences. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Cox, 477 So. 2d 963 (Ala. 1985), that failure by the plaintiff (as opposed to a prescribing physician) to read a drug label precluded any finding of causation:[N]othing in the nature of [defendant’s] inadequate warning prevented plaintiff from reading it. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:34 am
Latest Regulatory Decisions Latest decisions of the Scottish Information Commissioner Latest Decision Notices from the Information Commissioner’s Office Latest decisions of the First-tier Tribunal, General Regulatory Chamber [Information Rights] David Cox v IC EA/2010/0092. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Cox, S.A. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:10 am
(SEC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
In US v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
Recent changes made by General Convention 2009 to the Canons, in combination with some in the Church who want to establish a strong central authority under the Presiding Bishop, and the ego of the current occupant of that office, have pushed ECUSA to the brink of a crisis, from which it cannot emerge unscathed. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Bolton is a strong proponent of executive power, privilege and secrecy. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm
For instance, in NAACP v. [read post]
