Search for: "Strong v. Ponder"
Results 41 - 60
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Strong brands as a barrier to entry, this time from "The Economist" | UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trade Mark Directive 2015 into UK law | Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Actavis second medical use battle | EPO looking for new legally qualified members of the Boards of Appeal | Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the line for exhaustion under patent law? [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am
”European Commission also seeks fairer balance in its approach to SEPsThe EC has been pondering SEP licensing policy issues for at least a few years, including an extensive consultation process with workshop discussions. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
It resulted in a 2008 Supreme Court decision—Munaf v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
” At ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma focuses on the cert petition in one of the cases, Karsjens v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am
” Yang noted that the “thrust” language came from a 2010 Supreme Court opinion, Abbott v. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm
Whether it ought to remain any part of my concern is something I don’t plan to ponder very much in 2017. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am
Especially strong are Rosa’s observations as to how and why contemporary civil-military relations are marred by mistrust and misunderstandings at the senior levels of government, and how this plays out on a day-to-day basis. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
Given this strong antipathy towards the rule, the general lack of thought most of the Justices have given it most of the time is striking. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:50 am
You have to know what is right for them and be strong enough to try to make it happen. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:31 am
There will be strong incentives to do so, though. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:08 pm
August 19, 2015); and Juice Generation Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
Mullen describes the Court at oral argument: Taft, the Chief Justice, ponderous, conservative, a strong Hamiltonian in political opinions but known to be broadly liberal on all questions of religious tolerance. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:52 am
PPL EnergyPlus and CPV Maryland v. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in Obama v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
