Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 7,722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
The erosion of these essential democratic institutions comes at a time when the United States is classified as a “flawed democracy,” and the world-wide democracy index has fallen precipitously. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:21 am
Carême v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
In 2016 the United States Government published its first National Action Plan on Responsible Business Conduct. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:20 am
Hasemann v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm
Meanwhile, the "invasion" issue will be before the Fifth Circuit again in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 am
From Norgren v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:58 am
Carême v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
The Council of Europe will bear the travel and subsistence expenses of one representative from each member State (two in the case of the state whose representative has been elected Chair). [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:38 am
Moreover, it is not a monopolist in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
" But then in House v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
v=1 Li, T., Yang, T., Zhu, J. 2022. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:54 am
G’s employment contract stated that her normal place of work would be on the vessel on voyages worldwide, or wherever required by YMC Ltd for the proper performance of her duties. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
” Representing the United States, Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
The United States has submitted a draft resolution to the U.N. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm
In Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
The majority’s misinterpretation of the exemption renders the statute in violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as the Wisconsin Constitution. [read post]