Search for: "Stuart Shapiro" Results 81 - 100 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2017, 8:35 am by Eugene Volokh
This September, Ben Shapiro and Milo Yiannopoulos have both been invited by student groups to speak at Berkeley. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:44 am
In the thinly-reasoned opinion of Stuart v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
In an essay for the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Professor Stuart Shapiro and Environmental Protection Agency economist Laura Stanley looked at the role of economists in federal regulatory agencies. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:09 am by jonathanturley
Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 4:28 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributors. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
Working with Stuart Shapiro of Rutgers University and a team of graduate students, I surveyed sites looking for information related to rulemaking. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Writing for the George Washington University’s Regulatory Studies Center, Stuart Shapiro, professor at the Rutgers Edward J. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
FLASHBACK FRIDAY In a 2017 essay in The Regulatory Review, Stuart Shapiro, professor of public policy at Rutgers University, predicted that the Congressional Review Act would cause agencies to rush through regulations to prevent an incoming Congress from repealing them. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Treasury Department, Cary Coglianese, professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and Stuart Shapiro, professor at the Edward J.Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers University, put forward data showing that the Trump Administration accomplished less deregulation than it claimed and that many commentators have thought. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am by David Kopel
Argument Our brief is a collabortion between me (Research Director, Independence Institute; Associate Policy Analyst, Cato Institute) and three full-time Cato lawyers: Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Mathew Larosiere. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:40 am by Lisa Ouellette
Numerous patent academics, practitioners, and judges gathered in Austin at the University of Texas School of Law yesterday and today for a conference on patent damages, organized by Prof. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
.; Shapiro, Carl  Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking [article]  85 Tex. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
      “Appreciating the Politics Inside Benefit-Cost Analysis”by Stuart Shapiro, Rutgers University, and John Morrall, Mercatus Center (April 2)   Why do some regulations deliver greater value to society than others? [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Mark Walsh of Education Week, with commentary from Kenneth Jost, who at Jost on Justice discusses an amicus brief in the case which argues that “a ruling for the religious groups also could undermine state laws protecting the right of terminally ill patients to reject extraordinary life-sustaining measures”; from Greg Lipper, who argues at Bill of Health Blog that “the science underlying the plaintiffs’ arguments that the government requires… [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:08 pm by Omar Khodor
IN THE NEWS A federal district court denied a request to invalidate the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
IN THE NEWS The Iowa Supreme Court declined to lift a block on the state’s six-week abortion ban which a lower court had established after Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds signed the ban into law in 2018. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 7:08 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Chair of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Reeve T. Bull
Professors Christopher Carrigan and Stuart Shapiro, for example, have argued for “back of the envelope” regulatory analyses that are much shorter and simpler but allow key stakeholder groups to weigh in early, before the agency has already made up its mind. [read post]