Search for: "Stuart Taylor"
Results 101 - 120
of 513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
Stuart Taylor, Jr. has penned the latest Brookings Essay. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
No indication Cohan ever tried to contact “Joe” to verify.pp. 133-135: Nifong denying he ever told Jackie Brown about the case as free advertising; Cohan never asked Brown for comment.p. 194 Nifong confidence in Mangum story; neutral narrativep. 195: neutral narrative of state of DNA in casep. 239: neutral narrative of Nifong meeting with Meehanp. 240: defense attorneys criticize Nifong; no comment of any type from Cohanpp. 277-278: neutral narrative of Nifong/Himan meeting with Meehanp.… [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 11:32 am
In both appearances, Cohan demonstrated an ability to be fast and loose with the facts that would have made his protagonist, Mike Nifong, blush.(4) For those who missed it, Stuart Taylor’s 40-minute interview on C-SPAN, discussing the Cohan thesis. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Nothing, however, is preventing him from posting a list of endnotes, as Stuart and I did for UPI, to his Facebook page or even his twitter account. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:34 am
My colleague Stuart Taylor appeared this morning on the Imus program. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
”In fact, as Steel admitted in an e-mail sent to Stuart Taylor and me, he has no knowledge on what (if anything) occurred in the bathroom.Cohan has never acknowledged the error, but in his most recent press appearances, he has ceased to make it.4.) [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
COHAN: Completely dispassionately.Comment: Given what we’ve seen from him, such as his labeling Stuart Taylor as among “the haters” for having the temerity to question him, imagine what a “passionate” William D. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
” As the book summarized, as if by rote, scores of other articles, op-eds, and blog posts, so too did it summarize Stuart Taylor’s opinion on the Times article, without saying whether or not Cohan agreed with Taylor. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
That obligation strikes me as even more important when the reporter’s chief source (in this case Nifong) has serious problems with credibility.Yet several journalist reviewers (of what my colleague Stuart Taylor has termed the “puff-piece” variety) have praised Cohan for his “evenhanded” approach and tone. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:31 am
A Stuart Taylor Jr. article at The New Republic (about the book "The Price of Silence: The Duke Lacrosse Scandal, the Power of the Elite, and the Corruption of Our Great Universities"). [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
” It’s little surprise that Feinstein (described by Cohan, p. 616, as the “world-famous journalist” who was “extremely generous” with his time) is Cohan’s kind of commentator.While Cohan summarizes (p. 394) in two paragraphs Stuart Taylor’s critique of the Times August 2006 whitewash, in his own words he terms the Times article “comprehensive. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:18 pm
Panelists include Steven Calabresi, William Eskridge, Neomi Rao, Jonathan Turley, Steven Vladeck, Michael Carvin, Stuart Taylor, Susan Dudley, John Eastman and even a couple of conspirators (Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz and yours truly), among many others. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:25 pm
It’s almost as if his bookers believe that a pro-prosecutorial misconduct message would appeal to liberals, a deeply troubling thought to those of us who are center-left Democrats but don’t see a Nifong apologia as consistent with the party’s values.In the event, Cohan retreated from labeling Stuart Taylor among “the haters” yesterday, so I suppose his message could be said to have grown more temperate. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 11:25 am
During the broadcast, Stuart Taylor called in to ask Cohan a couple of questions. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
” [emphasis added] Yet virtually everyone who has covered the case in depth (Joe Neff, Stuart Taylor and I, 60 Minutes, even Duff Wilson) had seen (and reported on) the document prepared by Levicy. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 10:42 pm
In an e-mail to Stuart Taylor and me, Steel has now responded to the author’s description of his beliefs on the case.The takeaway: in two separate TV appearances, Cohan has misrepresented what Steel told him.The book’s treatment of Steel is a classic example of Cohan's argument-by-insinuation. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Taylor, Wendy Puriefoy, Richard D. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:34 am
In The Daily Beast, Stuart Taylor, Jr., looks at Justice Anthony Kennedy’s role on the Court, describing him as “far more than the ‘swing vote’ on many enormously important and controversial issues that he is reputed to be. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:59 am
When the decision came out, I had an exchange with prominent legal columnist Stuart Taylor on this issue (see here and here). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 10:12 am
Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr. (2012)15. [read post]
