Search for: "Stuart v. Heard"
Results 1 - 20
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm
Of note, there are similar industry managed programs elsewhere, but the legislature heard they are expensive and this will increase the cost of paint in Maryland. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
Stuart Harrow, a longtime Defense Department employee, was furloughed in 2013 due to federal budget cuts. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[10] The June 1, 1972 Report of the Advisory Committee on Enforcement Policies and Practices—now commonly referred to as the Wells Report—included a lengthy discussion about the settlement of Commission enforcement actions, and made several recommendations related to the settlement process.[11] The Commission had decades of experience settling cases, through both settlements on a no-admit/no-deny basis and settlements allowing defendants to deny wrongdoing.[12]… [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
The appeals were heard by Newy LJ, Arnold LJ and Stuart-Smith LJ. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:38 am
In Tapis International v INS , 94 F. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
The case is being heard today before Judges Carolyn Dineen King, Stuart Kyle Duncan, and Kurt D. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
’ (Kohler v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
This is not the first, (or even the second) hearing in which I have heard Mr Davidoff make this submission. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:10 am
In this instance, 16 young people from across Montana, who were between 2 and 18 years old when the case was filed in 2020, brought their constitutional climate lawsuit, Held v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
” Although not all of the evidence the administrator heard would have been admissible [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
On 22 May 2023, Tipples J heard an application in QRT v JBE QB-2022-000825. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Mischon de Reya has a blog post analysing the implications of the first civil claim for sexual “image-based abuse” in the recently decided case of FGX v Stuart Gaunt [2023] EWHC 419 (KB). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:05 am
He also made public statements in opposition to same-sex marriage when the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Oberfegell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
On 9 November 2022 there were hearings in the cases of Sharif v Associated Newspapers Limited and LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
