Search for: "Sturgeon v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
Ct. 1061 (2016)Sturgeon v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
On March 22, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Sturgeon v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
Sturgeon and Alaska contended that the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) precludes NPS from regulating activities on state-owned lands and navigable waters that fall within the boundaries of National Park System units in Alaska. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:44 am
Here is the opinion in Sturgeon v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 9:09 am
<> Building Association of the Bay Area v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:15 am
(antitrust) and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
United States, Lozman v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:49 am
When the court hears a second oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
United States, 247 F. 3d 1032 (2001) (en banc); John v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:55 am
The oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 12:30 pm
Sturgeon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 12:30 pm
Sturgeon v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Figure 2: The Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, the Conservation Service Unit at issue in Sturgeon v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:00 am
United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
In Sturgeon v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
United States Department of the Interior (Land into Trust)Sturgeon v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
United States Department of the Interior (Land into Trust)Sturgeon v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
” Findley’s belief that the second sentence made state-owned submerged lands “not a portion of the park,” prompted Alito to remark that “whether something can be within a unit but not be a portion of the unit is kind of a nice question. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
