Search for: "Sturm v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2022, 2:14 pm by Unknown
Sturm, Santa Clara County Superior Court case # 17-PR-181558 [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm by Barry Barnett
Sturm Foods, Inc., 764 F.3d 750 (7th Cir. 2014), that “[i]f the [district] court thought that no class can be certified until proof exists that every member has been harmed, it was wrong. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Professor of Law at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
”[ix] General, vague statements about a product’s superiority, rather than a misdescription of a specific or absolute characteristic of the product, may lead to dismissal of the claim if the court finds it implausible th [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
”[ix] General, vague statements about a product’s superiority, rather than a misdescription of a specific or absolute characteristic of the product, may lead to dismissal of the claim if the court finds it implausible th [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
A recent decision of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça gives rise to a brief analysis of the subject in the following note. [read post]