Search for: "Stutzman v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 4:15 am
Stutzman has chosen to retire so her beloved employees can run her business, Arlene’s Flowers. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm
The justices once again did not act, however, on the petition for rehearing filed by Washington state florist Barronnelle Stutzman, who declined to make custom flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding because of her religious beliefs. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:25 pm
Today, briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
In Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 3:40 pm
Boardman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm
The justices will also take another look at the petition for rehearing filed by Barronelle Stutzman, a Washington state florist who has argued that requiring her to create custom flower arrangements for same-sex weddings would violate her religious beliefs. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 4:53 am
” After the Supreme court decided the Colorado case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:04 am
In Carson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:44 am
In Espinoza v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:06 am
This decision reconsidered Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:59 am
” [IJ “Short Circuit” on Francis v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:26 am
The justices put Stutzman’s appeal on hold until they ruled on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:08 pm
After the Washington Supreme Court upheld a ruling that she had violated the state’s law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation, Stutzman asked the justices to review the state court’s decision. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 2:58 pm
The next case on their docket on the issue – Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
In State of Washington v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 9:55 am
Supreme Court in Hurst v. [read post]
