Search for: "Succession of Doll v. Doll"
Results 81 - 89
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), Does Petra Moser show patents encourage successful innovation? [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 11:18 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), remain the basis for every decision regarding obviousness,” noted Commissioner for Patents John Doll. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 7:35 am
See Campbell v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 7:32 pm
Famous Original Ray's Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 6:29 am
Fartman's slightly more limited repertoire included two of Fred's jokes.After the success in the district court of the claims for copyright and trade mark infringement, as well as unfair competition, the 7th Circuit affirmed: "it turns out that there is a niche market for farting dolls, and it is quite lucrative," stated Wood J. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 11:03 am
Just last year, the company unveiled a succession of continually cheaper and smaller iPod models like Russian nesting dolls. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:32 am
She sometimes wonders whether V's Secret was really a nascent First Amendment opinion as much as it was a statutory interpretation opinion. [read post]
