Search for: "Sullivan v. Alabama State Bar" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
”  But just as states had set the bar to recovery low before Sullivan, they also have the power to raise that bar should there be an “after Sullivan. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Alabama State Board of Education (294 F. 2d 150, 5th Cir. 1961) a federal court upheld the expulsions and barred the students’ readmission to the school.) [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by David Lat
Thomas [Supreme Court of the United States via SCOTUSblog] Maples v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:58 pm by Jeff Gamso
  He got Sullivan & Cromwell, a fancy-ass, white-shoe, big-shot law firm in New York to represent him in state post-conviction proceedings because Alabama can't be bothered actually paying lawyers to do that sort of work. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Jason Mazzone
Maples asks the Supreme Court for a ruling that the state timing rule is not consistently applied and therefore is not adequate to procedurally bar his habeas petition. [read post]
14 May 2013, 1:05 pm by Ray Dowd
Patton began teaching full time as an Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Alabama. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:59 am by Amy Howe
One phrase that came up several times at Tuesday’s oral argument in Maples v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm by nflatow
Two lawyers from the New York law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell (S&C) agreed to represent Maples pro bono during his state post-conviction appeals, since Alabama — virtually alone among death penalty states — provides no post-conviction counsel for death row inmates. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:36 am by Susan Brenner
Nonetheless, later that evening, [he] drove . . . over the state line to the Slab House bar in Mississippi. . . . [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:45 pm by Lovechilde
  He got Sullivan & Cromwell, a fancy-ass, white-shoe, big-shot law firm in New York to represent him in state post-conviction proceedings because Alabama can't be bothered actually paying lawyers to do that sort of work. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 9:33 am by INFORRM
Back in 1964, in the landmark civil rights case of New York Times v Sullivan, the Court affirmed the signal importance of free debate about the public activities of politicians and other officials. [read post]