Search for: "Sullivan v. Alabama State Bar" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities Alabama – AG Steve Marshall Accuses Alabama Ethics Director Tom Albritton of ‘Self-Dealing’ from Charitable Trust AL.com – Mike Cason | Published: 3/1/2023 State Attorney General Steve Marshall accused Alabama Ethics Commission Director Tom Albritton of improperly benefiting from a charitable trust for which Albritton was a board member because Albritton’s children received… [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Sullivan: Clarified rules for conflicts of interests when a defense attorney is representing multiple clients, finding that defendant need only show that the attorney’s conduct adversely affected him. 1980 United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
”  But just as states had set the bar to recovery low before Sullivan, they also have the power to raise that bar should there be an “after Sullivan. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:22 am by Richard Hunt
The danger of being the enforcer The plaintiff in Sullivan v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Alabama to give her the time to prepare an opinion respecting denial in the case. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 556 (1985), there is no First Amendment right to use content generated and paid for entirely by another for a purpose contrary to the intent of the content’s creation, and barred by state law. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 9:33 am by INFORRM
Back in 1964, in the landmark civil rights case of New York Times v Sullivan, the Court affirmed the signal importance of free debate about the public activities of politicians and other officials. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sullivan; no defense bar as such when the case came down, when such cases were dealt w/by private detectives and not 1A lawyers—thought [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
United States (1983), the Supreme Court rejected a university’s claim for a religious exemption from a federal rule that barred race discrimination by tax-exempt organizations. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Alabama State Board of Education (294 F. 2d 150, 5th Cir. 1961) a federal court upheld the expulsions and barred the students’ readmission to the school.) [read post]