Search for: "Sullivan v. Department of Corrections"
Results 81 - 100
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2012, 10:01 am
Dollinger in Lomaglio v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:29 am
Sometimes they are recalled and changed.Landa v Blocker 2011 NY Slip Op 06370 ; Appellate Division, Second Department is an example of the result of persistence in appellate work. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:15 am
Today is no exception. in Landa v Blocker 2011 NY Slip Op 00191 ;Appellate Division, Second Department we see attorney fees in the matrimonial law arena. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm
Sullivan, a U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm
So, in R (Noone) v Governor of Drake Hall Prison [2010] 1 WLR 1743 (a case concerning the determination of the correct release date of a prisoner), the point was not taken that the claim was ostensibly a criminal cause/matter and the case ultimately reached the Supreme Court via the Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:59 pm
THOMAS, INTERIM COMMISSIONER OF THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
“Yes,” Sullivan answers. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:52 am
Landa v Blocker 2011 NY Slip Op 06370 ; Decided on August 30, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Second Department is an example of the result of persistence in appellate work. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:10 am
Saylor's ruling was a significant setback to the Justice Department and Sullivan. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:45 pm
See Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:51 am
CJLF has filed this friend-of-the-court brief in Maples v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:17 am
The Green court then explained that New York Penal Law § 205.00(3) grants the State Department of Correctional Services [DOCS] the authority to declare what is contraband. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
inLanda v Blocker ;2011 NY Slip Op 00191 ;Decided on January 11, 2011 ;Appellate Division, Second Department we see attorney fees in the matrimonial law arena. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The trial court entered judgment in favor of the City and the Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed in City of Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:09 am
”In another change of work schedule case, In the Arbitration between Sullivan County and Teamsters Local 445, 276 AD2d 861, Appellate Division, Third Department, [Motion for leave to appeal denied, 96 NY2d 703 ], the court overturned an arbitrator’s ruling that Sullivan County had violated the collective bargaining agreement when it unilaterally changed the work schedule of certain employees.The individuals involved worked 35 hours per week as aides for the… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
It is entitled to have regard to them in assessing needs (R v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:50 pm
Martin v. [read post]
