Search for: "Sullivan v. Murray"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Glenn Murray 107. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:28 am
But he may not.The case is Vincent v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On Thursday 2 February 2023 Murray J heard an application in the case of Stokoe Partnership v Dechert LLP. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
On 26 October 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:06 pm
Town of Sullivan’s Island v Murray, 2021 WL 3890292 (SC App. 9/2/2021) [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am
Zachary Cohen, Sara Murray and Jason Morris report for CNN. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
Lawyers representing Shazam, the company set up by the original show’s creator John Sullivan prior to his death in 2011, accuse the theatre production company of tricking customers into thinking it was an officially endorsed product. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
An appeal is expected, which would give the Supreme Court the opportunity to reconsider the so-called “Sullivan standard,” which states that is ought to be difficult for any public official to prove that a falsehood was damaging enough to surmount First Amendm [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 04322-21 Ruayrungruang v The Sunday Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 04302-21 Lovatt v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03315-21 Ruayrungruang v The Daily Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 00798-21 Reynolds v The Daily Telegraph, 1… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
Sullivan. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
On 24 and 25 March 2021 there was a trial in the libel case of Junejo v New Vision TV Limited before Murray J. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
For example, in Hynes-O’Sullivan v O’Driscoll [1988] IR 436, 449, 450, [1989] ILRM 349, 360, 361, Henchy J declined to expand the defence of qualified privilege, holding that the existing rules properly reflected that constitutional balance (emphasis added): I have no difficulty in rejecting the submission, which has only slender judicial support, that the occasion is one of qualified privilege if the person making the communication honestly believes that… [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
” Murray v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Kinney v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Sullivan if it does. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:23 am
On June 6, in Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
Feeney J effectively held that the plaintiff was entitled to ordinary compensatory damages, but he failed to appreciate that such damages include damages for distress (Conway v Ireland [1991] 2 IR 305, 317, [1991] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ; Griffin J and McCarthy JJ concurring); Shortt v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2007] 4 IR 587, 612, [2007] IESC 9 (21 March 2007) [82] (Murray CJ), [2007] 4 IR 587, 648, [2007] IESC 9 [223]… [read post]
