Search for: "Sullivan v. Murray"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2020, 11:23 am
On June 6, in Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
Feeney J effectively held that the plaintiff was entitled to ordinary compensatory damages, but he failed to appreciate that such damages include damages for distress (Conway v Ireland [1991] 2 IR 305, 317, [1991] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ; Griffin J and McCarthy JJ concurring); Shortt v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2007] 4 IR 587, 612, [2007] IESC 9 (21 March 2007) [82] (Murray CJ), [2007] 4 IR 587, 648, [2007] IESC 9 [223]… [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:04 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Todd Murray v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:12 pm
Hyundai’s reasoning was also directly at odds with the influential Third Circuit en banc decision Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
" Murray Franklin Jacks v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:05 am
(Judge Murray dissented). [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
” Murray v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
An appeal is expected, which would give the Supreme Court the opportunity to reconsider the so-called “Sullivan standard,” which states that is ought to be difficult for any public official to prove that a falsehood was damaging enough to surmount First Amendm [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
Lawyers representing Shazam, the company set up by the original show’s creator John Sullivan prior to his death in 2011, accuse the theatre production company of tricking customers into thinking it was an officially endorsed product. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Andrew Murray (LSE). [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
On 24 and 25 March 2021 there was a trial in the libel case of Junejo v New Vision TV Limited before Murray J. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
Sullivan; the NYT depends on ownership of copyright to protect freedom of expression. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 04322-21 Ruayrungruang v The Sunday Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 04302-21 Lovatt v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03315-21 Ruayrungruang v The Daily Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 00798-21 Reynolds v The Daily Telegraph, 1… [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
It proposes making Sullivan better with two concrete, constitutionally mandated modifications to the existing doctrine, to bring it more in line libel law in other common-law countries like England, Australia, and New Zealand. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
In the case of Lascaris v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
On 26 October 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
For example, in Hynes-O’Sullivan v O’Driscoll [1988] IR 436, 449, 450, [1989] ILRM 349, 360, 361, Henchy J declined to expand the defence of qualified privilege, holding that the existing rules properly reflected that constitutional balance (emphasis added): I have no difficulty in rejecting the submission, which has only slender judicial support, that the occasion is one of qualified privilege if the person making the communication honestly believes that… [read post]
