Search for: "Sullivan v. State Bar" Results 121 - 140 of 559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 292 (1964); see Karaduman v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
In reality, even under existing law, so-called unprotected speech is protected in important ways—for example, by the bar on prior restraints—while state actors can, in a variety of contexts, regulate or even prohibit protected speech. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
It’s at least arguable that some instances about which the Duke might wish to complain are already long outside that limitation period – and some teetering on being time-barred. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
That is a bar the majority of field has not hit and is not on track to do so. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am by Peter Mahler
Madison Sullivan Partners LLC v PMG Sullivan St., LLC Madison Sullivan Partners LLC v PMG Sullivan St., LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op 04460 [1st Dept June 6, 2019], involved a dispute between 50/50 owners of a real estate venture organized as a Delaware LLC. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Fanworks provide incredible benefits in literacy, sexuality education, language learning, community building, and other good things that come from making something you love and sharing it with other people who might just love it too.On the content v. tech distinction that Maria Strong made: we consider ourselves content folks who use tech. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215, 240 (1990) (reaffirming this principle as to “prior restraint[s] in advance of a final judicial determination on the merits”); State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
" I have found only one case expressly upholding such a catchall injunction against a First Amendment challenge, and there the decision was heavily influenced by the interest in protecting the parties' children—the injunction had been entered as a result of contentious divorce, and barred the ex-husband from defaming his ex-wife. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
” I have found only one case expressly upholding such a catchall injunction against a First Amendment challenge, and there the decision was heavily influenced by the interest in protecting the parties’ children—the injunction had been entered as a result of contentious divorce, and barred the ex-husband from defaming his ex-wife. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am by SHG
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]