Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan" Results 81 - 100 of 3,718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Macey (Yale Law School), on Tuesday, December 17, 2024 Tags: Delaware Court of Chancery, moelis, Shareholders, Tornetta v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Macey (Yale Law School), on Tuesday, December 17, 2024 Tags: Delaware Court of Chancery, moelis, Shareholders, Tornetta v. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 10:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" The plaintiffs are conservative lawyers who speak out on political and religious issues "on forceful terms" and fear that the Connecticut disciplinary rules might be broad enough to result in their discipline.The case is Cerame v. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 3:21 am by SHG
Sullivan, and a federal judge’s holding almost certainly made the burden insurmountable. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 9:10 am by Tom Smith
" Clarence Thomas has written repeatedly on this topic, and Neil Gorsuch joined in that call in 2021's Berisha v Lawson. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[2]  The Final Rule remains largely consistent with Treasury’s April 4, 2024 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “Proposed Rule”), with a few adjustments in response to public comments.[3]  Substantively, the Final Rule makes these six changes:  (i) expands the types of information transaction parties and other persons may be required to provide to CFIUS; (ii) allows the CFIUS Staff Chairperson to prescribe a time frame within which transaction parties must… [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
In R v Sullivan, 2022 SCC 19, the Supreme Court of Canada rejected this view. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 8:20 am by Unreported Opinions
Torts — Medical malpractice — Summary judgment This case initiated as a medical malpractice action. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On November 15, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery found that certain of the directors of Bridge Street Worldwide, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 6:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
’ “To state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, “a plaintiff must allege that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately [*2]caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Lam v Weiss, 219 AD3d 713, 716 [alterations and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Marinelli… [read post]