Search for: "Sullivan v. The Standard Fire Insurance Co." Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am by Andrew Spillane
This state-centric arrangement has come under fire in the last couple of decades, with the federal government staking its ground regulating insurance first around the periphery and then increasingly at the core of the insurance industry. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; from Tarrant County; 2nd district (02-01-00227-CV, 152 SW3d 172, 12-02-04)07-0503 ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
The trial court entered judgment in favor of the City and the Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed in City of Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
In that case, the Court held, without dissent, that religious organizations have a First Amendment right to fire ministerial employees for any reason at all—even reasons that would violate anti-discrimination laws. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Lawyers for the Marsh family, the owners and operators of the defunct Tri-State Crematory, have gone to federal court to stop the relatives of the uncremated dead from challenging the settlement of state court litigation between Tri-State's owners and its insurance company, the Georgia Farm Bureau Insurance Co. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (Spicy IP), It’s a mad idea, but it might just work – Sun’s decision to reduce number of patent applications: (IAM) More alternative ADR practices: preventing patent shark attacks: (The IP ADR Blog), The ADR: insurance and indemnity agreements – protecting against patent terrorists: (The IP ADR Blog), Language and IP value and valuation: (Pat Sullivan’s Blog)   Global - Copyright Grammy winner, Joss Stone, shows support… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Nine months later, a 21-year-old white man is accused of opening fire in a Walmart in El Paso, killing 22 people and injuring dozens more after writing a manifesto railing against immigration and announcing that “this attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas. [read post]